Hi,
There are no objections how to process TODOs. I've used
suggested approaches for them.
I've added examples for array.
I'll start a vote for this again.
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20241218.170107.1224859230223769469@clear-code.com>
"Re: [DISCUSS] Arrow array repres
Hi,
Thanks for sharing your opinion. There is no objection to
remove the C data interface limitation.
I opened a new PR that focus on only statistics schema:
* PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/45058
* Preview:
http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/45058/format/StatisticsSchema.html
It
> I think it's fair not to mention any other Arrow-like transport mechanism
> since the benefits of transporting the statistics as an Arrow array are
> less clear right now.
When we (or applications) start thinking about more advanced statistics
like compressed histograms and sketch data structure
First of all, thank you for driving this proposal! I don't think there's
anything particularly bad or wrong about mentioning the C data interface in
the title of the document...my initial comment was mostly a reaction to the
fact that most of the content of the proposal is describing this schema,
w
I think the feedback is more along the lines of: we can just standardize a
representation of statistics, without referencing where it's used (C Data
Interface or otherwise). So people are free to use it wherever they want,
whether C Data Interface or IPC or somewhere else. At the same time, we a
