Thanks both :-)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:22 AM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> I'll start one shortly.
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:31 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think having a vote as a procedural matter would be a good thing.
> >
> > I have run dozens of public and private votes in my rol
I'll start one shortly.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:31 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Yes, I think having a vote as a procedural matter would be a good thing.
>
> I have run dozens of public and private votes in my role as a PMC
> member. I would appreciate if another PMC would assist with this vote.
>
Yes, I think having a vote as a procedural matter would be a good thing.
I have run dozens of public and private votes in my role as a PMC
member. I would appreciate if another PMC would assist with this vote.
Thanks
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:37 PM Ryan Murray wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Does this r
Hi All,
Does this require a vote? If yes what is the process for initiating one &
if no I hope this is enough time for feedback and I would like to remove
the draft designation from the PR
Best,
Ryan
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:31 AM Ryan Murray wrote:
> As per everyone's feedback I have renamed
As per everyone's feedback I have renamed GetFlightSchema -> GetSchema and
have removed the descriptor on the rpc result message. The doc has been
updated as has the draft PR
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:32 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> Sounds good to me, I would just echo what others have said.
>
> On T
Sounds good to me, I would just echo what others have said.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:17 AM Ryan Murray wrote:
> Thanks Wes,
>
> The descriptor is only there to maintain a bit of symmetry with
> GetFlightInfo. Happy to remove it, I don't think its necessary and already
> a few people agree. Simil
Thanks Wes,
The descriptor is only there to maintain a bit of symmetry with
GetFlightInfo. Happy to remove it, I don't think its necessary and already
a few people agree. Similar with the method name, I am neutral to the
naming and can call it whatever the community is happy with.
Best,
Ryan
On
I'm generally supporting of adding the new RPC endpoint.
To make a couple points from the document
* I'm not sure what the purpose of returning the FlightDescriptor is,
but I haven't thought too hard about it
* The Schema consists of a single IPC message -- dictionaries will
appear in the actual
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for writing this up! I made a couple of minor comments in the
doc/implementation, but overall I'm in favor of having this RPC
method.
Best,
David
On 8/1/19, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please see the attached document for a proposed addition to the Flight
> RPC[1]. This is
