Hi,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! It seems that we should
try this. I'll start a vote for this.
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20250516.174834.1553983659340140685@clear-code.com>
"[DICSUSS] Split Swift to separated repository" on Fri, 16 May 2025 17:48:34
+0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
repository split. Some active
contributors may be appeared or the current lack of activity
may be kept.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [DICSUSS] Split Swift to separated repository" on Mon, 19 May 2025
13:53:44 -0400,
Matt Topol wrote:
> +1. I am supportive of this, though I still
+1. I am supportive of this, though I still have concerns given the
current lack of representation, activity and support for the swift
impl. Just worried about it falling by the wayside.
That aside, thanks for the work on this Kou!
--Matt
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 1:47 PM Ruoxi Sun wrote:
>
> +1.
+1
Thanks Kou.
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:49 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a similar discussion to the "[DISCUSS] Split Go
> release process" thread[1], the "[DISCUSS] Split Java
> release process" thread[2], the "[DISCUSS] Split R release
> process" thread[3], the "[DISCUSS] Split C
+1. Thank you kou for driving this!
*Regards,*
*Rossi SUN*
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:17 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> +1, I am supportive of this change as well.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 16/05/2025 à 10:48, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a similar discussion to the "[DI
+1, I am supportive of this change as well.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 16/05/2025 à 10:48, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
Hi,
This is a similar discussion to the "[DISCUSS] Split Go
release process" thread[1], the "[DISCUSS] Split Java
release process" thread[2], the "[DISCUSS] Split R release
process" t
+1 Thanks Kou and also +1 to Raúl's idea of a policy!
Am Fr., 16. Mai 2025 um 23:13 Uhr schrieb Andy Grove :
>
> +1
>
> Thanks Kou.
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:27 AM Bryce Mecum wrote:
>
> > Thanks for this Kou. I think the change makes sense and is a good idea.
> >
> > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at
+1
Thanks Kou.
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:27 AM Bryce Mecum wrote:
> Thanks for this Kou. I think the change makes sense and is a good idea.
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:49 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a similar discussion to the "[DISCUSS] Split Go
> > release process" t
Thanks for this Kou. I think the change makes sense and is a good idea.
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:49 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a similar discussion to the "[DISCUSS] Split Go
> release process" thread[1], the "[DISCUSS] Split Java
> release process" thread[2], the "[DISCUSS] Spli
Thanks Kou for raising this. I am supportive of this change.
I would say it might be interesting to have a policy on when and how new
implementations are added to the main repository. We might want to have new
language implementations start directly on a new repository or have them on
apache/arrow
10 matches
Mail list logo
