Yes , best to has dedicated AVX512 device. Great news that you are working on
the machine😊
Thanks,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Wes McKinney
Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 12:41 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [C++] Runtime SIMD dispatching for Arrow
I might be able to contribute an AVX
thub.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/compute/kernel.h#L561
> [3]
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/util/cpu_info.cc#L451
>
> Thanks,
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Wes McKinney
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:39 PM
sage-
From: Wes McKinney
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:39 PM
To: dev ; Micah Kornfield
Subject: Re: [C++] Runtime SIMD dispatching for Arrow
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:12 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> >
> > Since I develop on an AVX512-capable machine, if we have runtime
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:12 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> >
> > Since I develop on an AVX512-capable machine, if we have runtime
> > dispatching then it should be able to test all variants of a function
> > from a single executable / test run rather than having to produce
> > multiple builds and
>
> Since I develop on an AVX512-capable machine, if we have runtime
> dispatching then it should be able to test all variants of a function
> from a single executable / test run rather than having to produce
> multiple builds and test them separately, right?
Yes, but I think the same of true with
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:47 PM Yibo Cai wrote:
>
> Thanks Wes, I'm glad to see this feature coming.
>
> From history talks, the main concern is runtime dispatcher may cause
> performance issue.
> Personally, I don't think it's a big problem. If we're using SIMD, it must be
> targeting some tim
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:19 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> Hi Wes,
> I think you highlighted the two issues well, but I think they are somewhat
> orthogonal and runtime dispatching only addresses the binary availability
> of the optimizations (but actually makes testing harder because it can
> po
Hi Wes,
I think you highlighted the two issues well, but I think they are somewhat
orthogonal and runtime dispatching only addresses the binary availability
of the optimizations (but actually makes testing harder because it can
potentially hide untested code paths).
Personally, I think it is valua
Thanks Wes, I'm glad to see this feature coming.
From history talks, the main concern is runtime dispatcher may cause
performance issue.
Personally, I don't think it's a big problem. If we're using SIMD, it must be
targeting some time consuming code.
But we do need to take care some issues. E.
Hi,
I totally agree that arrow should has a built-in support for runtime
dispatching facilities just like other popular computing libs to fully utilize
the modern hardware capacity, we feel arrow has great potential performance
chance with the advanced cpu SIMD feature.
It's ok for me to stop
10 matches
Mail list logo
