er and
> MakeReaderGenerator) to generate for a regular source node.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Weston Pace
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:37 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cpp Memory Pool Clarification
>
> > Is there anything else I
generate for a regular source node.
-Original Message-
From: Weston Pace
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:37 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: cpp Memory Pool Clarification
> Is there anything else I'd need to change?
Maybe try something like this:
https://github.com/westonpa
);
> > > > ExecContext ctx(&logging_pool, ...);
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything else I'd need to change?
> > > >
> > > > Beyond that, we should also expect to see some allocations from
> > > TableSourc
pool());
> > > ExecContext ctx(&logging_pool, ...);
> > > ```
> > >
> > > Is there anything else I'd need to change?
> > >
> > > Beyond that, we should also expect to see some allocations from
> > TableSourceNode going through the logg
g through the logging memory pool, even if AsOfJoinNode
> was using the default memory pool instead of the Exec Plan's pool, but I am
> not seeing anything come through...
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Weston Pace
> > Sent: Monday, July 1
also expect to see some allocations from
> TableSourceNode going through the logging memory pool, even if AsOfJoinNode
> was using the default memory pool instead of the Exec Plan's pool, but I am
> not seeing anything come through...
>
> -Original Message-
>
g come through...
-Original Message-
From: Weston Pace
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 2:47 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: cpp Memory Pool Clarification
Are you changing the default memory pool to a LoggingMemoryPool?
Where are you doing this? For a benchmark I think you would need to change the
Are you changing the default memory pool to a LoggingMemoryPool?
Where are you doing this? For a benchmark I think you would need to
change the implementation in the benchmark file itself.
Similarly, is AsofJoinNode using the default memory pool or the memory
pool of the exec plan? It should be