Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-03-10 Thread Wes McKinney
Regarding https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/arrow2 — please (looking at the PMC members who work on Rust) be careful about IP provenance considerations with code developed outside the Foundation. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:15 AM Dominik Moritz wrote: > > I have a talk prepared to talk about my A

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-03-10 Thread Dominik Moritz
I have a talk prepared to talk about my Arrow implementation in WebAssembly. On Mar 10, 2021 at 04:38:21, Andrew Lamb wrote: > Reminder that today is the next Rust sync call > > Potential topics for discussion: > * Ballista / DataFusion / etc > * I remember that someone else was going to demo t

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-03-10 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
Hi, If there is time available, I would like to present the status of the experimental arrow2 repo, and gather feedback on what would be the best way to proceed. 10-15m? Best, Jorge On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:57 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Also: > * sema

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-03-10 Thread Andrew Lamb
Also: * semantics for CAST and what to do on failure (return NULL or error) [Mike S] On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:38 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Reminder that today is the next Rust sync call > > Potential topics for discussion: > * Ballista / DataFusion / etc > * I remember that someone else was goin

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-03-10 Thread Andrew Lamb
Reminder that today is the next Rust sync call Potential topics for discussion: * Ballista / DataFusion / etc * I remember that someone else was going to demo the use of Arrow but I can't remember exactly what that was now On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:59 AM Dominik Moritz wrote: > Somewhat relat

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-02-16 Thread Dominik Moritz
Somewhat related, I tried to compile DataFusion to WASM and it didn’t work because of some dependencies: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/issues/ARROW-11615. I wonder whether DataFusion could have a feature flag for only shipping what is WASM compatible? On Feb 15, 2021 at 12:13:04,

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-02-15 Thread Andrew Lamb
> Also, unrelated, is there a schedule for the sync calls? Will try and carve out some free time for the next one :) It is every other Wednesday at noon EST. Here is the original announcement with more details: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raa72e1a8a3ad5dbb8366e9609a041eccca87f85545c3bc3d8

Re: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-02-14 Thread Daniël Heres
I think it's a great idea to make default / dev compile times faster and have clear guidelines for how to use dependencies. Some low-hanging fruit could be moving some development dependencies under different crates to reduce compile times and bigger dependencies, i.e. those needed for criterion.

RE: [Rust] [DataFusion] Topic for next Rust Sync Call

2021-02-14 Thread Ruan Pearce-Authers
I'd be interested in helping spec this out, it's especially tricky atm to track down issues when integrating DataFusion into the same binary as other medium/large dependencies. Recently hit a really specific issue where DataFusion depends on Parquet, which supports various compression algs, inc