>> 2. For StringView and ArrayView, if the parent has `validity = false`.
>> If they have `validity = true`, there offset might point to a
invalid
>> position
>I have no idea, but I hope not. Ben Kietzman might want to answer more
>precisely here.
I think, for view arrays, the offsets &
Le 29/06/2023 à 15:16, wish maple a écrit :
Sorry for being misleading. "valid" offset means that:
1. For Binary Like [1] format, and List formats [2], even if the parent
has `validity = false`. Their offset should be well-defined.
Yes.
2. For StringView and ArrayView, if the parent ha
Sorry for being misleading. "valid" offset means that:
1. For Binary Like [1] format, and List formats [2], even if the parent
has `validity = false`. Their offset should be well-defined.
2. For StringView and ArrayView, if the parent has `validity = false`.
If they have `validity = true`,
Le 29/06/2023 à 13:42, wish maple a écrit :
Thanks all!
So, in general:
1. For our Binary Like [1] format, and List formats [2], if the parent is
not valid, the offset should still be valid
What do you call a "valid" offset?
Thanks all!
So, in general:
1. For our Binary Like [1] format, and List formats [2], if the parent is
not valid, the offset should still be valid
2. For the StringView ListView [3] types arrow is currently working on,
if the parent is not valid, the child might has valid content
Am I right
Values in the `offsets` Buffer of a ListArray can’t be left undefined
because the length of a valid entry before a NULL entry is the offset
associated with that NULL entry minus the previous offset.
The ListViewArray format I’m working on doesn’t have that restriction
because all the information a
Le 29/06/2023 à 06:07, Weston Pace a écrit :
When a binary array or a list array element is null the cleanest thing to
do is to set the offsets to be the same. So, for example, given a list
array with 5 elements, if second item is null, the offsets could be 0, 8,
8, 12, 20, 50.
Question for
I agree with Antoine but I get easily confused by "valid, as in
structurally correct" and "valid, as in not null" so I want to make sure I
understand:
> The child of a nested
> array should be valid itself, independently of the parent's validity
bitmap.
A child must be "structurally correct" (e.g
Hi!
Le 28/06/2023 à 17:03, wish maple a écrit :
Hi,
By looking at the arrow standard, when it comes to nested structure, like
StructArray[1] or FixedListArray[2], when parent is not valid, the
correspond child leaves "undefined".
If it's a BinaryArray, when when it parent is not valid, would
Hi,
By looking at the arrow standard, when it comes to nested structure, like
StructArray[1] or FixedListArray[2], when parent is not valid, the
correspond child leaves "undefined".
If it's a BinaryArray, when when it parent is not valid, would a validity
member point to a undefined address?
And
10 matches
Mail list logo
