Okay, that makes sense. Looking forward to making an awesome 6.0 release
then.
On Sep 20, 2021 at 16:38:40, Neal Richardson
wrote:
> Unfortunately, I think we've passed the window for doing a 5.0.1. Since
> it's not trivial to make a release, and we're doing 6.0.0 in a couple of
> weeks (mid-Oc
Unfortunately, I think we've passed the window for doing a 5.0.1. Since
it's not trivial to make a release, and we're doing 6.0.0 in a couple of
weeks (mid-October), in my opinion it makes most sense to focus our efforts
on making the next release excellent.
Neal
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 4:25 PM
Neal, could you make a release?
On Aug 27, 2021 at 14:43:10, Dominik Moritz wrote:
> Are there any other changes for 5.0.1? It would be great to release a
> version with the fixes to the JS bundles since it prevents people from
> upgrading from Arrow 3.
>
> On Jul 30, 2021 at 14:31:59, Neal Ric
Are there any other changes for 5.0.1? It would be great to release a
version with the fixes to the JS bundles since it prevents people from
upgrading from Arrow 3.
On Jul 30, 2021 at 14:31:59, Neal Richardson
wrote:
> Let's give it a few more days to see what other issues come up as more
> peop
Let's give it a few more days to see what other issues come up as more
people install 5.0.0, then we can evaluate whether to do a general 5.0.1
patch release for all projects or if we should do something more targeted.
A vote on source will be required either way, but we've taken steps to
reduce th
Hi all,
We introduced a regression in Arrow that sometimes leads JS code bundlers
to emitting code that is missing some functionality. We have a patch for
this problem in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10826 that is now in
master. I would like to propose to release Arrow JS 5.0.1 with this c
