k in a few years and view the C++ "clean room" implementation from
the spec as a useful exercise.
cheers
Wes
> Just some quick thoughts by the way, might be better to discuss separately.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Micah Kornfield [mailt
--Original Message-
From: Micah Kornfield [mailto:emkornfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 12:23 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: More questions about layout spec
Hi Kai,
Based on a previous thread on the mailing list
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/arrow-dev/2
Hi Kai,
Based on a previous thread on the mailing list
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/arrow-dev/201603.mbox/%3c72a2bcfd-54d7-4376-8199-04a5535d8...@gmail.com%3E)
I believe the conclusion was there should be an optional reference
implementation for IPC so consumers of the memory format ar
Hi,
Looking at the layout spec, I have some more questions to complement to the
previous ones discussed.
About struct and union types:
1) The order of the fields (how they are declared in order) seems to be
important, as it will affect how the data are laid out. For example, in union
typ
