t; >>
>> >>
>> >> t = ibis.table([("a", "int64"), ("b", "int64")], name="table0")
>> >> result = translate(t.group_by("a").mutate(z = t.b.sum()), compiler)
>> >>
>> >> def tab
uffer(result_bytes), table_provider)
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Will Jones
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:30 PM Li Jin wrote:
> >>
> >> > For reference, this is the "relations" entry that I was referring to:
> >
quot;, "int64"), ("b", "int64")],
>> name="table0")
>> > >
>> > > test_table_0 = pa.Table.from_pydict({"a": [1, 2, 3], "b": [4,
>> 5,
>> > > 6]})
>> > >
>>
if not names:
> > >
> > > raise Exception("No names provided")
> > >
> > > elif names[0] == 'table0':
> > >
> > > return test_table_0
> > >
> > > else:
&
rovider)
> >
> > I think now the plan is passed properly and I got a "ArrowInvalid: Empty
> > substrait plan is passed"
> >
> >
> > Looking the plan reproduces by ibis-substrait, it looks like doesn't
> match
> > the expected format of Acero cons
y ibis-substrait doesn't have a "relations" entry - any
> thoughts on how this can be fixed? (I don't know if I am using the API
> wrong or some format inconsistency between the two)
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 1:54 PM Li Jin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am
w if I am using the API
wrong or some format inconsistency between the two)
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 1:54 PM Li Jin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing integration between ibis-substrait and Acero but hit a
> segmentation fault. I think this might be cause the way I am
> integrating thes
Hi,
I am testing integration between ibis-substrait and Acero but hit a
segmentation fault. I think this might be cause the way I am
integrating these two libraries are wrong, here is my code:
Li Jin
1:51 PM (1 minute ago)
to me
class BasicTests(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test
