Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

Just following up in case anyone was following that this turned out to be an NVCC bug that we've reported to the relevant team internally. We moved the `ipc.cu` file to `ipc.cpp` and it works as expected with gcc. Thanks everyone! -Keith On 7/22/19, 12:52 PM, "Keith Kraus" wrote: We're w

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

We're working on that now, will report back once we have something more concrete to act on. Thanks! -Keith On 7/22/19, 12:51 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote: Hi Keith, Can you try to further reduce the reduce your reproducer until you find the offending construct? Re

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

Hi Keith, Can you try to further reduce the reduce your reproducer until you find the offending construct? Regards Antoine. Le 22/07/2019 à 18:46, Keith Kraus a écrit : > I temporarily removed the csr related code that has the namespace clash and > confirmed that the same compilation warnin

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

I temporarily removed the csr related code that has the namespace clash and confirmed that the same compilation warnings and errors still occur. On 7/20/19, 1:03 AM, "Micah Kornfield" wrote: The namespace collision is a definite possibility, especially if you are using g++ which seems

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

The namespace collision is a definite possibility, especially if you are using g++ which seems to be less smart about inferring types vs methods than clang is. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:28 PM Paul Taylor wrote: > Hi Micah, > > We were able to build Arrow standalone with both c++ 11 and 14, but c

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

Hi Micah, We were able to build Arrow standalone with both c++ 11 and 14, but cuDF needs c++ 14. I found this line[1] in one of our cuda files after sending and realized we may have a collision/polluted namespace. Does that sound like a possibility? Thanks, Paul 1. https://github.com/rap

Re: Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

Hi Paul, This actually looks like it might be a problem with arrow-4800. Did the build of arrow use c++14 or c++11? Thanks, Micah On Friday, July 19, 2019, Paul Taylor wrote: > We're updating cuDF to Arrow 0.14 but encountering errors building that > look related to PR #4259

Error building cuDF on new Arrow with std::variant backport

We're updating cuDF to Arrow 0.14 but encountering errors building that look related to PR #4259 . We can build Arrow itself, but we can't build cuDF when we include Arrow headers. Using C++ 14 and have tried gcc/g++ 5, 7, and clang. Has anyone seen t