u
In
"[RESULT][Vote] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Mon, 12 May
2025 10:28:06 +0200,
Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote passes with 8 binding +1 votes and 1 +1 non-binding vote. No 0 or
> -1 votes. Thanks all!
>
> Binding votes:
> -
;> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > In
>> > "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May
>> 2025 10:48:40 +0200,
>> > Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like t
+1 (binding)
El jue, 8 may 2025 a las 11:46, Krisztián Szűcs ()
escribió:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On 2025. May 8., at 7:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > In
> > "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7
+1 (binding)
> On 2025. May 8., at 7:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> In
> "[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May 2025
> 10:48:40 +0200,
> Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would
+1 (binding)
In
"[VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process" on Wed, 7 May 2025
10:48:40 +0200,
Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
> corresponding release process to its own repository.
>
> M
+1
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 8:38 AM Bryce Mecum wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 1:48 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
> > corresponding release process to its own repository.
> >
> > Motivation:
> >
> > *
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 1:48 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
> corresponding release process to its own repository.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user
> burden.
>
+1 (binding)
Am Mi., 7. Mai 2025 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Neal Richardson
:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a é
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
> >>
+1 (binding)
Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
corresponding release process to its own repository.
Motivation:
* We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user
burden.
* We want to avoid
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
>> corresponding release process to its own repository.
>>
>> Motivation:
>>
>> * We
Hi,
I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the
corresponding release process to its own repository.
Motivation:
* We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user
burden.
* We want to avoid needless release tasks when releasing apache/arrow if it
is not ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
