The vote carries with 3 binding +1 votes, 2 non-binding +1, and 1 +0
Thanks all for voting. I will update the Format PR and plan to merge
the C++ PR soon thereafter
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:00 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> In
> "[VOTE] Removing validity bit
+1 (binding)
In
"[VOTE] Removing validity bitmap from Arrow union types" on Mon, 29 Jun 2020
16:23:23 -0500,
Wes McKinney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to remove
> the validity bitmap buffer from Union types
FYI: I just submitted a PR implementing this in C++ and in the
integration tests. It was not too awful
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7598
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:52 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> +0
>
>
> Le 29/06/2020 à 23:23, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed on the ma
+0
Le 29/06/2020 à 23:23, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to remove
> the validity bitmap buffer from Union types in the columnar format
> specification and instead let value validity be determined exclusively
> by constituent arrays of
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:29 AM Ben Kietzman
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:24 Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Micah Kornfield
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding) (I had a couple of nits on language, that
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:24 Wes McKinney wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Micah Kornfield
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding) (I had a couple of nits on language, that I put in the PR
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:24 PM Wes McKinney
> wrote:
> >
> > > H
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) (I had a couple of nits on language, that I put in the PR
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:24 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to remove
> > the v
+1 (binding) (I had a couple of nits on language, that I put in the PR
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:24 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to remove
> the validity bitmap buffer from Union types in the columnar format
> specification and inste
Hi,
As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has been proposed to remove
the validity bitmap buffer from Union types in the columnar format
specification and instead let value validity be determined exclusively
by constituent arrays of the union.
One of the primary motivations for this is to simp
