Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:18 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 > > In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com> > "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Let&#x

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:43 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:27 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : > > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that > we've discu

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:27 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've > > discussed a few things. > > > > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) Sorry for the noise about a new thread, I just checked the archive[1] and this is in a different thread. Thank you for this David. Andrew [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t78clfqzsby08d2ryc83gwrtm3cthq8 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:15 PM Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com> "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500, "David Li" wrote: > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've > discussed a few

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:11 PM Aldrin wrote: > This thread does have [VOTE] for me. does it not for you? > > Sent from Proton Mail for iOS > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:09, Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > Would it be possible to change the thread's subj

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

<<< text/html; charset=utf-8: Unrecognized >>> publicKey - octalene.dev@pm.me - 0x21969656.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've discussed a few things. I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it stable: - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf de

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

Would it be possible to change the thread's subject line to "[VOTE]" so it is more visible that we are proposing a change? I worry that this will be buried at the bottom of something that says "[DISCUSS]" On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote: > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on

[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've discussed a few things. I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it stable: - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf definitions (but leave the option definition for future addi