Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-08 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
gt; > > > Looked through the spec and C++ impl. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM wish maple < > > maplewi

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-07 Thread Ruoxi Sun
gt; > > Gang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM wish maple < > maplewish...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-07 Thread Alenka Frim
t; > > > > > Best, > > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM wish maple > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-06 Thread Dane Pitkin
t; +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Xuwei Fu > > > > > > > > > > David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > &

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-06 Thread Joris Van den Bossche
; > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Xuwei Fu > > > > > > > > David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-06 Thread Matt Topol
gt; > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > In > xbr9m_tfzz4-...@mail.gmail.com > > > > > > > &

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-06 Thread Felipe Oliveira Carvalho
gt; Xuwei Fu > > > > David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > In xbr9m_tfzz4-...@mail.gmail.com > &g

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-06 Thread Gang Wu
, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > In > > > > "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024 > > > 08:59:42 -0400, > > > Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > > > > > >> Hello Devs, >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread wish maple
+1 (non-binding) Best, Xuwei Fu David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > In > > "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024 >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread David Li
+1 (binding) On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > In > "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024 > 08:59:42 -0400, > Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > >> Hello Devs, >> >> I would like

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 (binding) In "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:59:42 -0400, Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > Hello Devs, > > I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8 > > The prior mailing list discussion thread can be f

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Vibhatha Abeykoon
+1 (non-binding) I reviewed the spec update. On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:22 AM Jacob Wujciak wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington > : > > > +1 (binding). Thanks for this addition! > > > > Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs. > > > > On Mon

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington : > +1 (binding). Thanks for this addition! > > Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:57 AM Weston Pace wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs. >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Dewey Dunnington
+1 (binding). Thanks for this addition! Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs. On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:57 AM Weston Pace wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:41 AM Ian Cook wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I reviewed the

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Weston Pace
+1 (binding) Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs. On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:41 AM Ian Cook wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I reviewed the spec addition. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:37 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > > Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR). > > > > Than

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Ian Cook
+1 (non-binding) I reviewed the spec addition. On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:37 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR). > > Thank you Joel! > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 05/08/2024 à 14:59, Joel Lubinitsky a écrit : > > Hello Devs, > > > > I would

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR). Thank you Joel! Regards Antoine. Le 05/08/2024 à 14:59, Joel Lubinitsky a écrit : Hello Devs, I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8 The prior mailing list discussion thread can be found at [1]. The format

[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
Hello Devs, I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8 The prior mailing list discussion thread can be found at [1]. The format documentation change can be found at [2]. A copy of the text is included in this email. A Go implementation can be found at [3]. A C++/Python implemen