Hi,
The vote carries with 3 +1 binding votes, no non-binding
vote and no -1 votes.
I'll merge https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36009 .
Thanks,
--
ko
In <20230628.103017.2111667987485891680@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support" on
+1
Thanks kou!
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 10:33 AM David Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Kou!
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 21:31, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > In <20230628.103017.2111667987485891680@clear-code.com>
> > "[VOTE][Format][Fli
+1
Thanks Kou!
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 21:31, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <20230628.103017.2111667987485891680@clear-code.com>
> "[VOTE][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support" on Wed, 28 Jun
> 2023 10:30:17 +0900 (JST),
> Sutou Kouhei wrot
+1
In <20230628.103017.2111667987485891680@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support" on Wed, 28 Jun 2023
10:30:17 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose result set expiration support for
> Flight RPC.
Hi,
I would like to propose result set expiration support for
Flight RPC.
See the following pull request and discussion for details:
* GH-35500: [C++][Go][Java][FlightRPC] Add support for result set expiration
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36009
* [DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Result set e
