Subject: Re: [Release] Request for patch release of arrow 3.x
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Probably a misunderstanding by the authors of that document. As
https://arrow.apache.org/release/ shows, we've been doing quarterly major
releases since roughly 2018, and they&#x
Probably a misunderstanding by the authors of that document. As
https://arrow.apache.org/release/ shows, we've been doing quarterly major
releases since roughly 2018, and they've been on the
January/April/July/October ballpark, with the occasional delay. Perhaps we
should formalize that somewhere o
Hi Arrow Devs,
>From the following road-map document I found, it appears to be that arrow
4.0 next major release is in June 2021 as opposed to April 2021.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qspsOM_dknOxJKdGvKbC1aoVoO0M3i6x1CIo58mmN2Y/edit#
Quoting the document here:
"...about plans for the 4.0
Hi Prem,
I didn't spot that this came from an NVIDIA email address when looking at
this email on my phone. I will ping you directly and report conclusions
back here.
Thanks,
Andy.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:01 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> Hi Prem,
>
> I'd like to learn more about your needs here.
>
Hi Prem,
I'd like to learn more about your needs here.
I mostly work on the Rust implementation but I work with the cuDF team in
my day job at NVIDIA.
I'll take a look at your PR on Monday.
Thanks,
Andy.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 3:47 PM Neal Richardson
wrote:
> I'll let others comment on a
I'll let others comment on a patch release, but let me clarify: we do major
releases quarterly, and 3.0.0 was in January, so 4.0.0 will be in April.
Neal
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Prem Sagar Gali wrote:
> Hi Arrow Devs,
>
> I'm a maintainer of a project called cuDF (
> https://github.com/
Hi Arrow Devs,
I'm a maintainer of a project called cuDF
(https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf.git) that is based on the Arrow columnar
format and depends on the Arrow C++ and Python libraries. Currently, we are
pinned to version `1.0.1`, but we've gotten feedback from the community that
they'd re
