Re: [Format][ADBC] GetObjects semantics for system objects

2024-04-02 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
I'm fine with this approach as well. Mostly I think it will just be helpful to say something about it in the spec or docs. This could mean prescribing specific behavior, or simply stating that the behavior is implementation-specific. Otherwise the next best thing for implementers to do is compare w

Re: [Format][ADBC] GetObjects semantics for system objects

2024-04-02 Thread David Li
I don't see why we should exclude them; I would also caution against treating the driver behavior (especially only drivers in one language) as a reference. On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, at 23:04, Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > Hi, > > The ADBC spec does not currently define whether system > catalogs/schemas/tab

[Format][ADBC] GetObjects semantics for system objects

2024-04-02 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
Hi, The ADBC spec does not currently define whether system catalogs/schemas/tables (e.g. information_schema.columns, sqlite_master, etc) should be included in the result of ConnectionGetObjects. A survey of existing driver implementations such as sqlite and postgresql indicates that the current c