+1 (non-binding) - especially the rabbit canonical extension!
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 06:59 Benjamin Kietzman wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:07 Gang Wu wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I'll propose a Rabbit canonical extension type next year.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gang
> >
> >
> > On Wed,
+1
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 22:07 Gang Wu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I'll propose a Rabbit canonical extension type next year.
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:49 AM wish maple wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity, so this turtle type is like an array
> > containing the info arrow stream ip
Out of curiosity, so this turtle type is like an array
containing the info arrow stream ipc batches?
Do binary values have some alignas rule? And
is `label` and `value` all non-nullable?
Best,
Xuwei Fu
Weston Pace 于2025年4月2日周三 02:52写道：
> I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I
+1 (binding)
I'll propose a Rabbit canonical extension type next year.
Best,
Gang
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:49 AM wish maple wrote:
> Out of curiosity, so this turtle type is like an array
> containing the info arrow stream ipc batches?
>
> Do binary values have some alignas rule? And
> is `l
I for one welcome our new turtle overlords.
+11 (non-binding, but some Fixodent will help)
On 2025/04/01 20:39:17 Matt Topol wrote:
> > What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
> How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
>
> it's TURTLES ALL TH
> What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
it's TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!
Are you too turtley for the turtle club?
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 4:37 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
+1 (binding)
Tested on Ubuntu 26.04.
El mar, 1 abr 2025, 21:58, Simon Perkins escribió:
> I would suggest addressing non-elephantine geometries in a separate
> extension type.
>
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, 21:51 Jacob Wujciak, wrote:
>
> > > It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself res
I would suggest addressing non-elephantine geometries in a separate
extension type.
On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, 21:51 Jacob Wujciak, wrote:
> > It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself rests upon the back
> of another turtle,
>
> What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elep
> It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself rests upon the back of
> another turtle,
What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
Until this glaring fault is addressed I am -0
Am Di., 1. Apr. 20
You bet your sweet ass I am.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:58 AM Simon Perkins
wrote:
> I concur. +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM Weston Pace wrote:
>
> > I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
> > text of the proposal inline below.
> >
> > [1] https://github
I concur. +1
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM Weston Pace wrote:
> I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
> text of the proposal inline below.
>
> [1] https://github.com/westonpace/arrow/tree/feat/turtle-extension-type
>
> TURTLE
> ==
>
> * Extension name: ``a
I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
text of the proposal inline below.
[1] https://github.com/westonpace/arrow/tree/feat/turtle-extension-type
TURTLE
==
* Extension name: ``arrow.turtle``.
* The storage type of the extension is ``Struct`` where the struc
12 matches
Mail list logo
