Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Daniël Heres
consider it > > >> > >> stable > > >> > >> > > >> > >> +1 (not binding) > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Laurent > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
stable > >> > >> > >> > >> +1 (not binding) > >> > >> > >> > >> Laurent > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol > >> >> > > > >> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 I think Flight SQL is not experimental anymore as it's actually used in production on several players :) Thanks for bringing this, Regards JB On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:59 PM David Li wrote: > > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-08 Thread Weston Pace
> > > > > >> > >> we have been using it with Dremio for a while now, and we > > consider > > > it > > > >> > >> stable > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> +1 (not binding) > > > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-08 Thread Micah Kornfield
for a while now, and we > consider > > it > > >> > >> stable > > >> > >> > > >> > >> +1 (not binding) > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Laurent > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol &

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-08 Thread Andrew Lamb
;> > >> +1 (not binding) > >> > >> > >> > >> Laurent > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol > >> >> > > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-08 Thread David Li
t;> >> > >> Laurent >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:52 PM Matt Topol >> > > > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > +1, I agree with everyone else >> > >> > >> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-08 Thread Laurent Goujon
t; > > > >> > > +1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. > > >> > > > > >> > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > >> > > > > >> > > From:

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-07 Thread Micah Kornfield
ses now. > >> > > > >> > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > >> > > > >> > > From: David Li > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > >> > > To: dev@

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-07 Thread David Li
Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >> > > ____ >> > > From: David Li >> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM >> > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org >> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as e

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-07 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
databases now. > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > > > > > From: David Li > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight S

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-07 Thread Laurent Goujon
s used in a good number of databases now. > > > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > > > From: David Li > > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org > > Subjec

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-06 Thread Matt Topol
, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM > To: dev@arrow.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental > > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove this > qual

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-06 Thread James Duong
+1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: David Li Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM To: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental Flight S

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-06 Thread Diego Fernandez
At this point we depend on it heavily :) +1 On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:06 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 > > In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> > "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 > -0500, > "Davi

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-06 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com> "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 -0500, "David Li" wrote: > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it'

[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-06 Thread David Li
Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove this qualifier? I don't expect us to be making breaking changes anymore. This came up in a GitHub PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040 -David