4:25 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Cc: Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the
MATLAB interface
Yes. We should use apache/arrow's GitHub Releases.
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MAT
Yes. We should use apache/arrow's GitHub Releases.
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB
interface" on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 19:11:16 +0100,
Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> In case it was not clear, even though the binary job is run on
> u
:11 PM
> To: Raúl Cumplido
> Cc: Sutou Kouhei ; dev@arrow.apache.org <
> dev@arrow.apache.org>; Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore <
> sgilm...@mathworks.com>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of
> the MATLAB interface
>
> In case it
To: Raúl Cumplido
Cc: Sutou Kouhei ; dev@arrow.apache.org
; Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the
MATLAB interface
In case it was not clear, even though the binary job is run on
ursacomputing/crossbow when we upload the binaries
tps://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html<https://arrow.apache.org/docs/status.html>
> > >
> > > Thanks for highlighting this. This makes sense, and we can follow up with
> > > a PR to add MATLAB to the status page.
> > >
> > >> How about cre
this would probably be a sensible location to
> > put the release notes.
>
> We can use GitHub Releases as I said. But if we use GitHub
> Releases, the release notes on GitHub Releases may include
> not only the MATLAB interface but also all
> implementations. It may not be useful f
us to the NEWS.md for the R bindings as you suggested (thanks or
pointing this out).
[1] https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/releases
Thanks for all your help!
Best,
Sarah Gilmore
____________
From: Sutou Kouhei
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 7:50 PM
To: dev@arrow
LAB updates in
> Apache Arrow release blog posts
> (e.g. https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2023/11/01/14.0.0-release/)
> may also be helpful.
Yes. We should do it. :-)
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB
interface" o
s.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange
[3] https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/content/fx/about.html#Why_GitHub
Best Regards,
Kevin Gurney
From: Dewey Dunnington
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:53 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Cc: Sarah Gilmore ; Lei Hou
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB
xt
> version of Apache Arrow JavaScript 0.4.1 is 13.0.0.)
>
> > We've noticed that Arrow-related projects which are not
> > part of the main apache/arrow GitHub repository
> > (e.g. DataFusion) follow a mailing list-based voting and
> > release process. However, i
whether it makes
> sense to follow this process for the MATLAB interface
> since it is part of the main apache/arrow repository.
If we want to use separated release for the MATLAB
interface, we should follow the same release process as
apache/arrow and other apache/arrow-* because it's
Hi All,
A considerable amount of new functionality has been added to the MATLAB
interface over the last few months. We appreciate all the community's support
in making this possible and are happy to see all the progress that is being
made.
At this point, we would like to create an initial "0.1
12 matches
Mail list logo
