On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:19:44 -0700
Will Jones wrote:
> In a discussion about new additions to C++ docs, someone had a question:
> Should we even be documenting this?
>
> Long-time contributors to Arrow C++ noted that many parts were written
> without the intention that those APIs would not be use
I think the convention we have been using is that headers included directly
in the "api.h" headers were considered public, those that aren't were
considered a gray area.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:51 AM Aldrin wrote:
> > many parts were written without the intention that those APIs would not
> b
> many parts were written without the intention that those APIs would not
be used directly
>From the proceeding sentence, I assume you mean that many parts were not
intended for direct use?
I think my personal take is that I consider all parts of the C++ libraries
to be public. Otherwise, I have
In a discussion about new additions to C++ docs, someone had a question:
Should we even be documenting this?
Long-time contributors to Arrow C++ noted that many parts were written
without the intention that those APIs would not be used directly. Instead,
they were intended as an implementation det
