hi Rares,
I think there is much more potential for confusion with binary values
(vs. fixed-width values) because any array may have a non-zero offset
(from being sliced).
If you have
const int32_t* value_offsets = binary_arr.raw_value_offsets();
then this accounts for any non-zero slice offset
Hi,
I have a question about the Array C++ API. BinaryArray has a
raw_value_offsets() public member. Should it also have a raw_vaues() public
member to give a pointer to the start of raw data? Or is this not feasible?
Thanks,
Rares