Re: [Gandiva] Active maintainers?

ar-2021, at 10:24 AM, Will Jones > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Vivek, > > > > > > > > The 18 PRs have the label "gandiva" in GitHub. Link: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pulls?q=is%3Ao

Re: [Gandiva] Replacing the LRU cache in gandiva

jira/browse/CALCITE-2040 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11135 > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:58 AM Vivekanand Vellanki > wrote: > > > > We are considering using an on-disk - this is planned for later. Even > with > > an on-disk cache, we s

Re: [Gandiva] Replacing the LRU cache in gandiva

We are considering using an on-disk - this is planned for later. Even with an on-disk cache, we still need an eviction policy to ensure that Gandiva doesn't use up the entire disk. For now, we are assuming that we can measure the cost accurately - the assumption is that the query engine would use

Re: [Gandiva] Active maintainers?

nks, > Micah > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:49 PM Vivekanand Vellanki > wrote: > >> Micah, >> >> My team is looking at the PRs. We are giving feedback. >> >> We are also in touch with the committers (Ravindra and Praveen) and will >> get them merg

Re: [Gandiva] Active maintainers?

Micah, My team is looking at the PRs. We are giving feedback. We are also in touch with the committers (Ravindra and Praveen) and will get them merged. Thanks Vivek On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:29 AM Micah Kornfield wrote: > Is anybody actively looking at PRs for Gandiva? There seems to be queu