Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.1.0 - rc1

2016-10-04 Thread Stack
I checked signature* and hash. These are good. I ran apache:rat against the top level dir -- see https://creadur.apache.org/rat/ -- and it flagged a bunch of files as problematic. When I looked at a few they seemed fine (MIT license) but others have no license at all; yaml files, json, shells scrip

Re: Code review tools for Arrow patches

2016-05-04 Thread Stack
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > I dont know about the other pmc members and committers but I prefer just > making Gerrit the only way to submit patches rather than one of many. It > seems to work well for Asterix and Kudu. > I'd say go for it. Can always undo if it prove