f
> this were the case with larger files, though (I'm not sure what
> fraction of a column chunk consists of data page headers vs. actual
> data in practice)
>
> - Wes
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Feras Salim wrote:
> > Hi Uwe,
> >
> > I'm qui
ize statistics of the parts of the individual Parquet file.
>
> Uwe
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 3:07 AM, Feras Salim wrote:
> > Hi, I was wondering if I'm missing something or currently the
> > `DELTA_BINARY_PACKED` is only available for reading when it comes to
> > p
Hi, I was wondering if I'm missing something or currently the
`DELTA_BINARY_PACKED` is only available for reading when it comes to
parquet files, I can't find a way for the writer to encode timestamp data
with `DELTA_BINARY_PACKED`, furthermore I seem to get about 10% increase in
final file size wh
