Re: Query on stuck Arrow Flight Client while interacting from local workstation (mac)

Hi David 1. the python server thinks the RPC is complete: Yes 2. the Java client got any (or all) of the data before getting stuck? Depends, if we are reading in batches of 1000 which is pretty low number we see data being streamed till 15000-18000 rows ultimately stuck, if we select a batch size

Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?

Thanks Kou! I think that sounds nice. Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 16:35, Sutou Kouhei wrote: Hi, I can do it. If we want, I can create apache/arrow-skyhook and extract cpp/src/skyhook in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-skyhook as a standalone lib

Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?

Hi, I can do it. If we want, I can create apache/arrow-skyhook and extract cpp/src/skyhook in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-skyhook as a standalone library. Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?" on Mon, 5 May 2025 12:41:14 -0700, Bryce Mecum wrote: > Would it be possible to ext

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.0 RC0

+1 (binding) I ran the following on Debian GNU/Linux sid: dev/release/verify_rc.sh 18.3.0 0 with: * go version go1.24.2 linux/amd64 Thanks, -- kou In "[VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.0 RC0" on Tue, 6 May 2025 13:36:55 -0400, Matt Topol wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to p

Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?

+1 In <6d8a825e-4c49-430b-8ecf-b7cfa3bb9...@python.org> "[C++] Deprecate Skyhook?" on Mon, 5 May 2025 10:05:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Skyhook" is a little-known C++ component that interfaces Arrow with > the Ceph distributed filesystem. It received it last non-trivial

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Tested on Ubuntu 25.04/amd64 On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 02:36, Matt Topol wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of > Apache Arrow Go version 18.3.0. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 436b24d6b6a68217984c51adda312bf0af2666cf [1] > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Split JS release process

+1 It seems that there is no objection. Raúl, could you start a vote for this? There are some blockers for C# split[1]. So we may split JS before C#. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/d8xwrxv44qbm2yvcwvwpgn63sgcg4og4 Thanks, -- kou In "Re: [DISCUSS] Split JS release process" on Wed, 16 A

Arrow community meeting May 7 at 16:00 UTC

Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is tomorrow, Wednesday 7 May 16:00 UTC (18:00 CEST / 17:00 BST / 12:00 EDT / 9:00 PDT). *** The Zoom meeting URL recently changed. Please update your calendars to use this link: *** https://zoom.us/j/94594790228?pwd=dD4nB2oHsrm18kKBe8QlGSJgb1oN7x.1 Meeting

[VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.0 RC0

Hi, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache Arrow Go version 18.3.0. This release candidate is based on commit: 436b24d6b6a68217984c51adda312bf0af2666cf [1] The source release rc0 is hosted at [2]. Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit te