Out of curiosity, so this turtle type is like an array
containing the info arrow stream ipc batches?
Do binary values have some alignas rule? And
is `label` and `value` all non-nullable?
Best,
Xuwei Fu
Weston Pace 于2025年4月2日周三 02:52写道：
> I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I
+1 (binding)
I'll propose a Rabbit canonical extension type next year.
Best,
Gang
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:49 AM wish maple wrote:
> Out of curiosity, so this turtle type is like an array
> containing the info arrow stream ipc batches?
>
> Do binary values have some alignas rule? And
> is `l
I for one welcome our new turtle overlords.
+11 (non-binding, but some Fixodent will help)
On 2025/04/01 20:39:17 Matt Topol wrote:
> > What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
> How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
>
> it's TURTLES ALL TH
Hello Everyone,
As planned I have just created the maintenance branch. We still have
some blockers open and the CDC PR is waiting for final review. [1]
Once the blockers are handled I will cut rc0.
Best
Jacob
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/65
Am Di., 25. März 2025 um 15:43 Uhr
Hi Alina,
I don't speak for the whole community but one approach I took in the past
[1] was opening a huge PR that does "everything" and as the reviews on that
one progressed I would extract smaller, self-contained PRs that got more
detailed reviews. Once those were merged, I would rebase and repe
> What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
it's TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!
Are you too turtley for the turtle club?
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 4:37 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
+1 (binding)
Tested on Ubuntu 26.04.
El mar, 1 abr 2025, 21:58, Simon Perkins escribió:
> I would suggest addressing non-elephantine geometries in a separate
> extension type.
>
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, 21:51 Jacob Wujciak, wrote:
>
> > > It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself res
I would suggest addressing non-elephantine geometries in a separate
extension type.
On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, 21:51 Jacob Wujciak, wrote:
> > It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself rests upon the back
> of another turtle,
>
> What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elep
> It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself rests upon the back of
> another turtle,
What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants?
How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them?
Until this glaring fault is addressed I am -0
Am Di., 1. Apr. 20
You bet your sweet ass I am.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:58 AM Simon Perkins
wrote:
> I concur. +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM Weston Pace wrote:
>
> > I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
> > text of the proposal inline below.
> >
> > [1] https://github
I concur. +1
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM Weston Pace wrote:
> I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
> text of the proposal inline below.
>
> [1] https://github.com/westonpace/arrow/tree/feat/turtle-extension-type
>
> TURTLE
> ==
>
> * Extension name: ``a
I've written a draft at [1] but for simplicity's sake I will include the
text of the proposal inline below.
[1] https://github.com/westonpace/arrow/tree/feat/turtle-extension-type
TURTLE
==
* Extension name: ``arrow.turtle``.
* The storage type of the extension is ``Struct`` where the struc
Greetings community,
This email is regarding GitHub issue#30622 [1] for the Arrow ODBC Driver. My
colleague Rob and I are planning to work on the ODBC API layer to for
flightsql-odbc backend. So we would like to know the community's preference for
PR formats. For starters, I am thinking that we
13 matches
Mail list logo
