Arrow Maintainer Dashboard

Hello everyone! Nic Crane and I have been working on a Quarto dashboard [1] that would help organise different sources of information when doing maintenance. The dashboard currently pulls in the data from * GitHub (for the last 3 months) * Stack Overflow (for the last 3 months) * Mailing list (fo

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Java 11 support in Arrow

Thanks Dane for once again pushing the topic on Java language support. In terms of project maintenance and long term growth, I am happy with this change. Regarding the usage of `--add-opens`, it would still be okay, given the fact that we provided that option either way. But in future, I think we

Re: [DISCUSS][Acero] Upgrading to 64-bit row offsets in row table

+1 Thanks for the proposal and it is a good move. On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:35 AM Jacob Wujciak wrote: > Thanks for the clear write up in the issue and PR! > > +1 it is clear that this is something that users want and the downsides > seem minimal. > > Velox also switched to 64bit about a year ag

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

+1 (non-binding) Nice work! On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:22 PM Joris Van den Bossche < jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 17:41, Matt Topol wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:40 AM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho < > > felipe...@gmail.

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

+1 (binding) On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 17:41, Matt Topol wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:40 AM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho < > felipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > -- > > Felipe > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:24 AM Gang Wu wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

+1 (binding) On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:40 AM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho < felipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -- > Felipe > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:24 AM Gang Wu wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Looked through the spec and C++ impl. > > > > Best, > > Gang > > > > On Tue, Aug

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

+1 (non-binding) -- Felipe On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:24 AM Gang Wu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Looked through the spec and C++ impl. > > Best, > Gang > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM wish maple wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Xuwei Fu > > > > David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道：

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

+1 (non-binding) Looked through the spec and C++ impl. Best, Gang On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM wish maple wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Xuwei Fu > > David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > >