Thanks for the eager discussion, great to see that we are aligned on the
broad strokes!
In general I think that this is not something we neither need to nor want
to implement from 0 to 100.
Incrementally evolving and evaluating our process is key for sucsh a core
change
> I think C#, JS, [Java], a
The vote passes with 3 binding, 4 non-binding +1 votes. Thanks Joel!
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, at 17:56, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 3:48 AM wish maple wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Xuwei Fu
>> ulk ingestion support for Flight SQL
>>
>> David Li 于2024年4月5日周五 16:38
> Probably major versions should match between C++ and PyArrow, but I guess
> we could have diverging minor and patch versions. Or at least patch
> versions given that
> a new minor version is usually cut for bug fixes too.
I believe even this would be difficult. Stable ABIs are very finicky in
C
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:06 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> We have had separate releases / votes for Arrow Rust (and Arrow DataFusion)
> and it has served us quite well. The version schemes have diverged
> substantially from the monorepo (we are on version 51.0.0 in arrow-rs, for
> example) and it doe
