Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 I ran the following on Debian GNU/Linux sid: JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java \ dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.11.0 0 with: * g++ (Debian 13.2.0-13) 13.2.0 * go version go1.21.7 linux/amd64 * openjdk version "17.0.10" 2024-01-16 * Python 3.11.8 * ruby 3.1.2p20 (

Re: [VOTE][RUST][DataFusion] Release Apache Arrow DataFusion 37.0.0 RC1

2024-03-28 Thread L. C. Hsieh
+1 (binding) Verified on M3 after setting RUST_MIN_STACK=300. Thanks Andy. On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:39 PM Andy Grove wrote: > > Yes, I also saw this (both on Ubuntu and Mac), and I had to set > RUST_MIN_STACK=300 for the tests to pass. > > I filed https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafu

Re: [VOTE][RUST][DataFusion] Release Apache Arrow DataFusion 37.0.0 RC1

2024-03-28 Thread Andy Grove
Yes, I also saw this (both on Ubuntu and Mac), and I had to set RUST_MIN_STACK=300 for the tests to pass. I filed https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9848 to improve the release verification documentation to mention this. On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:59 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > I

Re: [VOTE][RUST][DataFusion] Release Apache Arrow DataFusion 37.0.0 RC1

2024-03-28 Thread L. C. Hsieh
I got the following error when running verify-release-candidate.sh: thread 'tpcds_physical_q54' has overflowed its stack fatal runtime error: stack overflow error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p datafusion --test tpcds_planning` On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:22 PM Andy Grove wrote: > > Hi, > > I wo

[VOTE][RUST][DataFusion] Release Apache Arrow DataFusion 37.0.0 RC1

2024-03-28 Thread Andy Grove
Hi, I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation, version 37.0.0. This release candidate is based on commit: 799be5e76bd631608b2357dbbe600afc2cebc359 [1] The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. The changelog is located at [3]. Please download

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread Bryce Mecum
+1 (non-binding) Verified on Windows x86_64 with USE_CONDA=1. I ran into two small issues and filed an issue [1] and sent in a PR containing the changes I made. [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/1683 On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:07 AM David Li wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to pr

Re: [VOTE] Protocol for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports

2024-03-28 Thread Matt Topol
> There is a word doc with no implementation or PR. I think there could be an implementation / PR. In the word doc there is a link to a POC implementation[1] showing this protocol working with a flight service, ucx and libcudf. The key piece here is that we're voting on adopting this protocol sp

Re: [VOTE] Protocol for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports

2024-03-28 Thread Weston Pace
I'm sorry for the very late reply. Until yesterday I had no real concept of what this was talking about and so I had stayed out. I'm +0 only because it isn't clear what we are voting on. There is a word doc with no implementation or PR. I think there could be an implementation / PR. For exampl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread Dewey Dunnington
+1! I ran: export DOCKER_DEFAULT_PLATFORM=linux/amd64 USE_CONDA=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.11.0 0 Matt - could you open an issue? The R package is not supposed to run those tests unless some very specific environment variables are defined in ~/.Renviron. On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at

[DISCUSS] Versioning and releases for apache/arrow components

2024-03-28 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hello Everyone! I would like to resurface the discussion of separate versioning/releases/voting for monorepo components. We have previously touched on this topic mostly in the community meetings and spread across multiple, only tangential related threads. I think a focused discussion can be a bit

Re: [VOTE] Protocol for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports

2024-03-28 Thread Matt Topol
I'll keep this new vote open for at least the next 72 hours. As before please reply with: [ ] +1 Accept this Proposal [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... Thanks everyone! On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:51 PM Benjamin Kietzman wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 18:36 Matt Topol

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread Matt Topol
+1 (binding) Verified on PopOS! 22.04 amd64 using Conda with: USE_CONDA=1 ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.11.0 0 Though there's one issue that i don't think should block the release: > Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. > Last 13 lines of output: > ── Error ('test-adbc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread Dane Pitkin
+1 (non-binding) Verified on MacOS 14.4.1 aarch64 with Conda using: DOCKER_DEFAULT_PLATFORM=linux/amd64 USE_CONDA=1 ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.11.0 0 On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:07 AM David Li wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 - RC0

2024-03-28 Thread David Li
Hello, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache Arrow ADBC version 0.11.0. This is a release consisting of 36 resolved GitHub issues [1]. This release candidate is based on commit: 3cb5825bf551ae93d0e9ed2f64be226b569b27a7 [2] The source release rc0 is hosted at