+1
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:38 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Paul Nienaber would like to propose explicit session management for Flight
> RPC. This proposal was previously discussed at [1]. A candidate
> implementation for C++ and Java is at [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 7
Hi David,
Yes, it is.
I can handle it with app_metadata field, but it would be better to have a
standard means.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: "David Li"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2024-02-16 (금) 05:13:23 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: Re: Flight RPC: Add total_records and total_bytes to F
+1
From: Sutou Kouhei
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 12:58 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Explicit session management for Flight RPC
+1
In
"[VOTE] Explicit session management for Flight RPC" on Wed, 14 Feb 2024
11:38:24 -0500,
"David Li" wrote:
> Paul Nienaber wou
+1
In
"[VOTE] Explicit session management for Flight RPC" on Wed, 14 Feb 2024
11:38:24 -0500,
"David Li" wrote:
> Paul Nienaber would like to propose explicit session management for Flight
> RPC. This proposal was previously discussed at [1]. A candidate
> implementation for C++ and Ja
Hi Taeyun,
Is this related to the previous thread about fetching a part of a result set?
I think it's reasonable to have these fields.
If others agree the next step would be to create a PR with an implementation
for review/voting.
Best,
David
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 18:58, 김태연 (Taeyun Kim)
Hi Ian
Thanks, no problem. I will alternatively attend Arrow and Iceberg
community meetings then :)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:55 PM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> Re the possibility of moving this meeting an hour earlier: some of the
> usual attendees have other conflicts at that time. For now,
Thanks Antoine,
As per discussion yesterday on the bi-weekly community call I'll be
working on creating a new 15.0.1 patch release.
Please if there are any other critical bug fixes that you want to
include to the patch release add the 15.0.1 milestone to the issues. I
will be cherry-picking and c
