Arrow community meeting February 14 at 17:00 UTC

2024-02-13 Thread Ian Cook
Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is tomorrow at 17:00 UTC / 12:00 EST. Zoom meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/87649033008?pwd=SitsRHluQStlREM0TjJVYkRibVZsUT09 Meeting ID: 876 4903 3008 Passcode: 958092 Meeting notes will be captured in this Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xr

Re: [DISCUSS] Arrow 15.0.1 patch release

2024-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Well, https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/20379 makes me wonder if anyone is using the Java Dataset bridge seriously. Le 13/02/2024 à 21:10, Dane Pitkin a écrit : Hi all, Arrow Java identified an issue[1] in the 15.0.0 release. There is an undefined symbol in the dataset module that cau

[DISCUSS] Arrow 15.0.1 patch release

2024-02-13 Thread Dane Pitkin
Hi all, Arrow Java identified an issue[1] in the 15.0.0 release. There is an undefined symbol in the dataset module that causes a linking error at run time. The issue is resolved[2] and I'd like to propose a patch release. We also have an open issue to implement testing to prevent this from happen

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to expand Arrow Communications

2024-02-13 Thread Benjamin Kietzman
Thanks for working on this! I think the flexibility of independent metadata and data storage and transfer is quite promising. I've added some comments On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:45 PM Matt Topol wrote: > Just pinging on this thread to hopefully encourage more comments and > engagement on the doc

Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight SQL ODBC driver

2024-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, A quick update about the ODBC driver donation: - I finished all required changes (ASF header everywhere, build update, etc) - I'm now on build & runtime test I should have the PR open in a couple of days. Thanks ! Regards JB On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 4:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight RPC: add 'fallback' URI scheme

2024-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi David, It's reasonable. I think we can start with your initial proposal (it sounds fine to me) and we can always improve step by step. Thanks ! Regards JB On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:53 PM David Li wrote: > > I'm going to keep the proposal as-is then. It can be extended if this use > case com

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight RPC: add 'fallback' URI scheme

2024-02-13 Thread David Li
I'm going to keep the proposal as-is then. It can be extended if this use case comes up. I'll start work on candidate implementations now. On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, at 03:22, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I think the original proposal is sufficient. > > Also, it is not obvious to me how one would switch f

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight RPC: add 'fallback' URI scheme

2024-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
I think the original proposal is sufficient. Also, it is not obvious to me how one would switch from e.g. grpc+tls to http without an explicit server location (unless both Flight servers are hosted under the same port?). So the "+" proposal seems a bit weird. Le 12/02/2024 à 23:39, David L