Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Arrow Flight Core tests

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks David, Good point. Let me create a PR to point to this when the pem is not found. Regards JB On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 3:00 PM David Li wrote: > > You can `git submodule update --init` to get the files. This is documented in > the environment setup [1], though the failing assertion could

Re: [DISCUSS] Fix Arrow Flight Core tests

2023-12-11 Thread David Li
You can `git submodule update --init` to get the files. This is documented in the environment setup [1], though the failing assertion could be more helpful about pointing this out. [1]: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/java/building.html#building On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, at 08:49, Jean

[DISCUSS] Fix Arrow Flight Core tests

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, I noticed that Arrow Flight Core doesn't build "out of the box" due to the TestTls failing. The reason what TestTls is failing is because it tries to read cert0.pem from the testing/data folder (at project root), but testing is empty by default. If I create a cert0.pem by hand (with self

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Daniël Heres
+1 Kind regards, Daniël Op ma 11 dec 2023 om 11:30 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > I agree, flagging new features as experimental is fine but the > existing "spec" is not experimental anymore imho. > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 5:39 PM David Li wrote: > > > > Yes, I think we can

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Sorry for the delay to vote. Regards JB On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:37 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.7.0. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 37122911c24f44318e6d4a084

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I agree, flagging new features as experimental is fine but the existing "spec" is not experimental anymore imho. Regards JB On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 5:39 PM David Li wrote: > > Yes, I think we can continue marking new features (like the bulk > ingest/session proposals) as experimental but remove

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 I think Flight SQL is not experimental anymore as it's actually used in production on several players :) Thanks for bringing this, Regards JB On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:59 PM David Li wrote: > > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that > it's now used by a few

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho

2023-12-11 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Congrats Felipe! On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:41 AM Joris Van den Bossche wrote: > > Congrats Felipe! ;) > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 05:41, Alenka Frim > wrote: > > > > Congratulations Felipe!! > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:25 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho < > > felipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho

2023-12-11 Thread Joris Van den Bossche
Congrats Felipe! ;) On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 05:41, Alenka Frim wrote: > > Congratulations Felipe!! > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:25 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho < > felipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you everyone! > > > > -- > > Felipe > > github.com/felipecrv > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

2023-12-11 Thread vin jake
+1 (binding) On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:18 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 > > In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com> > "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page no