Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

+1 Tested on macos m3 with Julia 1.10-rc2 -Jacob On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:08 PM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > +1 > > I ran > > export PATH="/Applications/ > Julia-1.9.app/Contents/Resources/julia/bin:$PATH" > dev/release/verify_rc.sh 2.7.0 1 > > ...on MacOS M1 Ventura > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:

Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.7.0 RC1

+1 I ran export PATH="/Applications/Julia-1.9.app/Contents/Resources/julia/bin:$PATH" dev/release/verify_rc.sh 2.7.0 1 ...on MacOS M1 Ventura On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:38 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of > Apache Arrow Julia ver

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:43 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:27 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : > > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that > we've discu

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:27 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've > > discussed a few things. > > > > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) Sorry for the noise about a new thread, I just checked the archive[1] and this is in a different thread. Thank you for this David. Andrew [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t78clfqzsby08d2ryc83gwrtm3cthq8 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:15 PM Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com> "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500, "David Li" wrote: > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've > discussed a few things. > > I would like to propose we remove

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:11 PM Aldrin wrote: > This thread does have [VOTE] for me. does it not for you? > > Sent from Proton Mail for iOS > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:09, Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > Would it be possible to change the thread's subj

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

<<< text/html; charset=utf-8: Unrecognized >>> publicKey - octalene.dev@pm.me - 0x21969656.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 (binding) Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit : Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've discussed a few things. I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it stable: - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf de

Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

Would it be possible to change the thread's subject line to "[VOTE]" so it is more visible that we are proposing a change? I worry that this will be buried at the bottom of something that says "[DISCUSS]" On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote: > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on

[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental

Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've discussed a few things. I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it stable: - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf definitions (but leave the option definition for future addi

Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight SQL ODBC driver

Am I reading the ticket correctly that this is also about importing some of the Dremio code into Arrow project (namely https://github.com/dremio/flightsql-odbc/). If it is the case, let me check how my company can provide the documentation for the project? On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 8:41 AM David Li

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:33 AM Micah Kornfield wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:29 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other > > standards in Arrow > > > > Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxDa

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

+1 On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:29 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other > standards in Arrow > > Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxData) I > agree it makes sense to remove the experimental label from the over

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

I agree it is time to "promote" ArrowFlightSQL to the same level as other standards in Arrow Now that it is used widely (we use and count on it too at InfluxData) I agree it makes sense to remove the experimental label from the overall spec. It would make sense to leave experimental / caveats on

Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight SQL ODBC driver

Thanks for the clarification. That does sound like a nontrivial amount of code. My worry is that we might not be able to get all the paperwork necessary from Amazon/Amazon contributors for the Timestream part. The document/guidelines are here [1]. Does that look doable from your end? [1]: https

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

Yes, I think we can continue marking new features (like the bulk ingest/session proposals) as experimental but remove it from anything currently in the spec. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 11:36, Laurent Goujon wrote: > I'm the author of the initial pull request which triggered the discussion. > I was f

Re: [DISCUSS] Expectations or Standards for ADBC Resource Utilization

There are no guidelines. I think as long as things are well-documented and (if needed) there is a way to disable or reduce usage of resources that might be excessive, then I don't think we need to restrict things. I'm not sure what that reference to the JDBC specification in Snowflake means.

Re: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental

I'm the author of the initial pull request which triggered the discussion. I was focusing first on the comment in Maven pom.xml files which show up in Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused about the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the current Flight/F

[DISCUSS] Expectations or Standards for ADBC Resource Utilization

I am working on some improvements to bulk ingestion for the Snowflake ADBC driver[1] and have been investigating existing implementations in related libraries. The current driver implementation defers to the gosnowflake library to handle this. In Snowflake's implementation, uploads are buffered in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho

Thank you everyone! -- Felipe github.com/felipecrv On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:08 PM Rok Mihevc wrote: > Congrats Felipe! > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:00 AM Gang Wu wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 8:37 AM Dewey Dunnington > > wrote: > > > > > Congrats! > > > > > > On Thu,