For argument's sake, I might suggest that the process you described in
your initial note would probably work best in another repo: you would
be able to iterate faster and release/version at your own pace. The
flexibility you get from moving to a separate repo comes at the cost
of extra responsibili
Hi,
> As a point of reference, we noticed that PyArrow is on
> version 14.0.0, but it feels "misleading" to say that the
> MATLAB interface is at version 14.0.0 when we haven't yet
> implemented or stabilized all core Arrow APIs.
I can understand this but I suggest that we use the same
version as
Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is tomorrow at 17:00 UTC / 12:00 EDT.
Zoom meeting URL:
https://zoom.us/j/87649033008?pwd=SitsRHluQStlREM0TjJVYkRibVZsUT09
Meeting ID: 876 4903 3008
Passcode: 958092
Meeting notes will be captured in this Google Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xr
+1 for the original proposal as well.
---
The (minor) problem I see with flags is that there isn't much point to this
feature if you are gating on a flag. I'm assuming the goal is what Dewey
originally mentioned which is making buffer calculations easier. However,
if you're gating the feature w
+1 (binding)
Verified on Intel Mac.
Thanks Raphael.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:38 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS.
>
> Thanks, Raphael.
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:22 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release o
+1 (binding)
Verified on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS.
Thanks, Raphael.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:22 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
> version 49.0.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 747dcbf0670aeab2ede474ed
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
version 49.0.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
747dcbf0670aeab2ede474edb3c4f22028d6a7e6 [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The changelog is located at [3].
Please downloa
Hi All,
A considerable amount of new functionality has been added to the MATLAB
interface over the last few months. We appreciate all the community's support
in making this possible and are happy to see all the progress that is being
made.
At this point, we would like to create an initial "0.1
+1 (non-binding)
Verified on M1 MacOS 13 with:
USE_CONDA=1 TEST_YUM=0 TEST_APT=0 ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
0.8.0 0
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:10 AM Dewey Dunnington
wrote:
> +1!
>
> I ran: TEST_APT=0 TEST_YUM=0 USE_CONDA=1
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.8.0 0
>
> On
I agree with the approach originally proposed by Ben. It seems like the
most straightforward way to implement within the current protocol.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 4:59 PM Dewey Dunnington
wrote:
> In the absence of a general solution to the C data interface omitting
> buffer sizes, I think the o
+1!
I ran: TEST_APT=0 TEST_YUM=0 USE_CONDA=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.8.0 0
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:18 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache Arrow
> ADBC version 0.8.0. This is a release consisting of 42 reso
Thanks for fixing those, Kou!
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023, at 22:02, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> I ran the following on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
>
> JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java \
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.8.0 0
>
> with:
>
> * g++ (Debian 13.2.0-4) 13.2.0
> * go version g
I filed https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5050 to discuss some
different possibilities (for example, do an arrow patch release or hold the
datafusion release)
Please share your thoughts on the ticket
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:51 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I think we should create a ticket
I think we should create a ticket to discuss releasing 48.1.0 (in addition
to 49.0.0) -- I can do so later today if no one beats me to it
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:47 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> It will contain breaking dependency updates, including object_store.
>
> I hope to cut it today.
It will contain breaking dependency updates, including object_store.
I hope to cut it today.
On 07/11/2023 11:43, Andrew Lamb wrote:
If the release later in the week doesn't have any breaking API changes,
perhaps it can be 48.1.0 (and thus also get the bugfix to datafusion)
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023
If the release later in the week doesn't have any breaking API changes,
perhaps it can be 48.1.0 (and thus also get the bugfix to datafusion)
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:41 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> I intend to cut a new arrow release later this week, I would prefer we
> wait for this.
>
>
I intend to cut a new arrow release later this week, I would prefer we
wait for this.
On 07/11/2023 11:39, Andrew Lamb wrote:
Perhaps we can create an arrow 48.1.0 patch release to include the fix?
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 AM Will Jones wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, Raphael. That
Perhaps we can create an arrow 48.1.0 patch release to include the fix?
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 AM Will Jones wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, Raphael. That likely narrows the scope of who
> is affected. If this bug is present in DataFusion 33, then delta-rs will
> likely skip upgradi
18 matches
Mail list logo
