Hi,
Could you add integration tests for this as David said at
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37679#issuecomment-1720143047 ?
See also:
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/format/Changing.html
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [VOTE] [Format] Add app_metadata to FlightInfo and FlightEndpoint" on
The PR has been updated for a bit with both C++ and Go implementations,
hopefully I can get some more votes on this thread?
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:16 PM Matt Topol wrote:
> The C++ code gets auto-generated during build right? Ah, fair point the
> C++ still uses it's own objects. I'll update
Thanks for bringing this up!
I have two concerns of dropping Java 8 support:
- As a low level library, users have to add specific flags [1] to use
Java 9 and up with Arrow to resolve issues with java.nio. This has
been annoying for our customers constantly. If this is not resolved,
I would say
Hi Arrow Java developers,
I would like to propose a timeline for dropping support for Java 8:
- Propose to drop JDK8 in Arrow v15 (2 releases from now)
- JDK 21 support will be added before removal of JDK8
Why?
- Java 8 no longer receives Premier Support (1)
- Some Arrow Java (test) dependencies
I think Java was usually raised as the odd child out when this has come up
before. Since Java 8 there are standard library methods to manipulate signed
integers as if they were unsigned, so in principle Java shouldn't be a blocker
anymore.
That said, ByteBuffer is still indexed by int so in pra
Hi,
Thank you for starting this discussion. I think the decision to use gRPC
and by extension HTTP certainly would encourage a design that explicitly
doesn't rely on server-side state. Not only is it now uncommon for
backend servers to have a unique globally-routable identity, but as
these ar
+1 (non-binding)
Verified with build script and in the context of using it as a 3rd party
dependency for dask-sql.
Thanks Andy
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:26 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> thank you Andy
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:28 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
+1 (binding)
thank you Andy
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:28 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on Intel Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:26 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Python
> > Bindings,
Hello,
As FlightSQL gets more widely adopted across the ecosystem, we hit some
issues trying to implement bind parameters in our stateless service. I
filed a ticket [1] that describes the issue as well as a potential
solution.
Please share your thoughts on the ticket
Andrew
[1] https://github.c
Hi JB,
No problem! Thanks for joining the release vote! It's helpful!
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow Flight SQL adapter for PostgreSQL 0.1.0 -
RC6" on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:50:11 +0200,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Sorry for the late reply (it t
+1 (non binding)
Sorry for the late reply (it took me time to review the release).
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:53 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC6) of
> Apache Arrow Flight SQL adapter for PostgreSQL version 0.1.0.
>
> This
11 matches
Mail list logo
