Successfully tested sources (except Python due to an odd and probably
harmless cmake issue) and binaries on Ubuntu 22.04.1/Conda/x86_64.
USE_CONDA=1 TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_PYTHON=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 13.0.0 3
USE_CONDA=1 TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1
dev/release/ve
+1 (non-binding)
—
Felipe
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 18:48 Jacob Wujciak-Jens
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:04 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:53 AM Neal Richardson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks all for the though
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:04 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:53 AM Neal Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks all for the thoughtful discussions here.
> >
> > Neal
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 4:14 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> > wrot
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:53 AM Neal Richardson
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks all for the thoughtful discussions here.
>
> Neal
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 4:14 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Despite my earlier misgivings, I think this will be a valuable add
+1 (non-binding)
Verified on pop_os 22.04 with conda
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM David Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Tested on Ubuntu Linux 20.04/Conda/x86_64
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, at 09:37, Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
+1
Tested on Ubuntu Linux 20.04/Conda/x86_64
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, at 09:37, Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 13.0.0 3
> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/
+1 (non binding)
I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 13.0.0 3
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 13.0.0 3
with:
* Python 3.11.4
* gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1u
+1
Thanks all for the thoughtful discussions here.
Neal
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 4:14 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Despite my earlier misgivings, I think this will be a valuable addition
> to the specification.
>
> To clarify I've interpreted this as a vote on both Utf8Vie
With 3 +1 votes (3 binding) the release is approved
The release is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/arrow-object-store-rs-0.7.0/
It has also been released to crates.io
Thank you to everyone who helped verify this release
On 15/08/2023 10:57, Raphael Taylor-D
+1 (binding)
Despite my earlier misgivings, I think this will be a valuable addition
to the specification.
To clarify I've interpreted this as a vote on both Utf8View and
BinaryView as in the linked PR.
On 28/06/2023 20:34, Benjamin Kietzman wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose adding Utf8Vi
Hi,
I ran the new benchmark comparison between the previous release
(12.0.1) and the new Release Candidate (13.0.0. RC3). This can be
found here [1].
Many thanks to Sam Albers and Jacob Wujciak for setting the crossbow
workflow to generate the report.
Thanks,
Raúl
[1] http://crossbow.voltrondat
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC3) of Apache
Arrow version 13.0.0. This is a release consisting of 440
resolved GitHub issues[1].
This release candidate is based on commit:
b7d2f7ffca66c868bd2fce5b3749c6caa002a7f0 [2]
The source release rc3 is hosted at [3].
The bi
12 matches
Mail list logo
