We originally agreed to treat the ADBC APIs as a specification, requiring votes
for updates to the specification.
To that end, this PR [1] proposes new APIs for ADBC to cover various gaps
identified, to clarify some language, and to make things consistent with the
Flight SQL proposals discussed
+1 for me.
The C structs are clean and leave good room for extension.
--
Felipe
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:04 PM David Li wrote:
> +1 for me.
>
> (Heads up: on the PR, there was some discussion since the last email and
> the meaning of 'experimental' was clarified.)
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023, a
+1 for me.
(Heads up: on the PR, there was some discussion since the last email and the
meaning of 'experimental' was clarified.)
On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 16:56, Matt Topol wrote:
> To clarify:
>
>> Depends on what we're voting on?
>
> Voting on adopting the spec and adding it (while still leavi
