+1 (binding)
Verified on x86_64 Ubuntu 22. Thanks Andy!
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 1:28 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 6:26 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusio
+1 (binding)
Verified on x86_64 Ubuntu 22
Thanks Raphael!
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 9:57 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on x86_64 mac
>
> Thanks Raphael
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:36 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Verified on M1 Mac.
> >
> > Thanks Raphael
+1 (binding)
Verified on M1 Mac.
Thanks Andy.
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 6:26 AM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation,
> version 24.0.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 37b2c53f281b9550034e7e69f5acf1ae666a0da7 [1]
I agree with Gang. The fact that a struct field may be backed by a
physically larger C++ ArrayData is irrelevant, as long as it's logically
interpreted as having "the same length".
(however, this implementation detail should ideally not leak into IPC or
C Data exports)
Regards
Antoine.
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation,
version 24.0.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
37b2c53f281b9550034e7e69f5acf1ae666a0da7 [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The changelog is located at [3].
Please download