Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Jin Shang
+1 (non-binding). Verified on macOS 12.5 aarch64 and Ubuntu 22.04 aarch64. Dependencies were installed via homebrew and apt. Everything went smoothly. On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 1:04 AM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache > Arr

[ADBC][Rust] Proposal for Rust ADBC API

2023-03-01 Thread Will Jones
Hello Arrow devs, I have created a PR to define a Rust API for ADBC [1], meant to parallel the ones in C, Go, and Java [2]. I'd like to get feedback on that. This API will be considered part of the ADBC format. Once I have addressed all feedback, we will put forward a vote for adoption into the AD

Re: Arrow community meeting March 1 at 17:00 UTC

2023-03-01 Thread Ian Cook
Below is a summary of the notes from this week's meeting Attendees: - Ian Cook - Raúl Cumplido - Dewey Dunnington - Ian Joiner - Will Jones - David Li - Bryce Mecum - Rok Mihevc - Sri Nadukudy - Weston Pace - Dane Pitkin Discussion: Fixed Shape Tensor canonical ExtensionType proposa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Dewey Dunnington
Thank you! I've followed up on an issue [1], but I believe the problem is that the version of the 'arrow' R package that is installed is before 10.0.0 when the tested features were added. In the R package DESCRIPTION the version constraint is >= 9.0.0, which should be updated (or those tests shoul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Sutou Kouhei
-0 I ran the following command line on Debian GNU/Linux sid: NANOARROW_CMAKE_OPTIONS=-DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/tmp/local \ dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.1.0 1 with: * Apache Arrow C++ main * R version 4.2.2 Patched (2022-11-10 r83330) I got 4 R failures: https://gist.githu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Bryce Mecum
+1 (non-binding) Verified on: - Fedora 37 (amd64) - Debian 11 (amd64) On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 8:04 AM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache > Arrow nanoarrow [0] version 0.1.0. This is an initial release consisting of > 31 r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread David Li
+1 (binding) Verified on macOS 13.2/aarch64 I had to use system R instead of Conda R. On Wed, Mar 1, 2023, at 12:52, Will Jones wrote: > +1 (non-binding). Verified with Conda on MacOS aarch64. > > Note: I needed to add gtest to the conda environment. Otherwise it went > smoothly. [1] > > [1] htt

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust Object Store 0.5.5 RC1

2023-03-01 Thread L. C. Hsieh
+1 (binding) Verified on M1 Mac. Thanks Raphael. On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:58 AM Will Jones wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). > > Verified on MacOS aarch64. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:53 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Verified on mac x86 -- the release train is quite impressive

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust Object Store 0.5.5 RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Will Jones
+1 (non-binding). Verified on MacOS aarch64. On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:53 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified on mac x86 -- the release train is quite impressive this month > > Thank you Raphael > > > p.s I get one local failure, tracked with [1] , but I don't think it is > serio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Will Jones
+1 (non-binding). Verified with Conda on MacOS aarch64. Note: I needed to add gtest to the conda environment. Otherwise it went smoothly. [1] [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/138 On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:04 AM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose the f

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.1.0 - RC1

2023-03-01 Thread Dewey Dunnington
Hello, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache Arrow nanoarrow [0] version 0.1.0. This is an initial release consisting of 31 resolved GitHub issues [1]. Special thanks to David Li for his reviews and support during the preparation of this initial release candidate