Thanks for investigating and looking through this. Your understanding
of how things work is pretty much spot on. In addition, I think the
points you are making are valid. Our ExecNode/ExecPlan interfaces are
extremely bare bones and similar nodes have had to reimplement the
same solutions (e.g.
+1 (non-binding)
Verified on M1 macos Monterey by running the verification script
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:02 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Verified on Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS (AMD) and macOS 12.3.1 (M1)
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:49 AM Chao Sun wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding), verified
hi all,
I've been catching up on the C++ execution engine codebase after a
fairly long development hiatus.
I have several questions / comments about the current design of the
ExecNode and their implementations (currently: source / scan, filter,
project, union, aggregate, sink, hash join).
My cur
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache
Arrow version 8.0.0. This is a release consisting of 604
resolved JIRA issues[1].
This release candidate is based on commit:
77d35493c3878542613340a981eb5fcbddbcc24e [2]
The source release rc2 is hosted at [3].
The binar
Hi all,
I would like to request your feedback on incorporating Windows binaries in
those Maven packages that have native Arrow dependencies, while drawing
your attention to the likely impact on jar size.
Five of the 23 arrow packages on Maven Central have native dependencies.
Four of those five
+1 (binding).
Verified on Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS (AMD) and macOS 12.3.1 (M1)
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:49 AM Chao Sun wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), verified on Intel Mac. Thanks Andrew!
>
> Chao
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 5:20 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding), verified on Intel Mac.
>
+1 (non-binding), verified on Intel Mac. Thanks Andrew!
Chao
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 5:20 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding), verified on Intel Mac.
>
> Thanks Andrew!
>
>
> Liang-Chi
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:42 PM Yang hao <1371656737...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
>
Thanks for verifying and fixing the problem!
I'm going to cut another RC including the patch.
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 2:44 PM David Li wrote:
>
> -1 for me due to the segfault in testing wheels. Weston and I were able to
> reproduce and Weston filed a fix: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1
-1 for me due to the segfault in testing wheels. Weston and I were able to
reproduce and Weston filed a fix: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13036
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022, at 21:39, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> I ran the followings on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
>
> * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
> TEST_
