Re: [DISCUSS] Further proposals for Flight SQL

hi David, Yes, I think we need to do an IP clearance for this work. Please let me know if I can assist, but it would probably be good for other PMC members to familiarize themselves with the process since we are likely to receive more large pieces of work that need to go through the process in the

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 9.0.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Verified on Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:57 AM Wang Xudong wrote: > +1 non-binding > verify on macOS. > "Release candidate looks good!" > > Thanks @alamb > --- > xudong > > Andrew Lamb 于2022年2月4日周五 21:14写道： > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a release of Apac

Re: [C++] Build/Link against master / custom branch

Hello, On Ubuntu, I managed to get a local external (i.e., to Arrow) project to build against a locally and custom-built Arrow project working using the following: * Locally build Arrow and install it to a directory $ARROW_ROOT_DIR * Configure the external project build using: cmake -D

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 9.0.0 RC1

+1 non-binding verify on macOS. "Release candidate looks good!" Thanks @alamb --- xudong Andrew Lamb 于2022年2月4日周五 21:14写道： > Hi, > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > version 9.0.0. I am also working on a blog post draft which I will share on > this mailin

[RUST] Proposed blog post for recent arrow/parquet highlights

Hello, I would love to get feedback on a proposed blog post[1] highlighting changes and improvements in the arrow-rs crate over the last few months. There was a lot of neat stuff happening that I wanted to tell the broader community about. Thanks! Andrew [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/

[VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 9.0.0 RC1

Hi, I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, version 9.0.0. I am also working on a blog post draft which I will share on this mailing list shortly. This release candidate is based on commit: fa728736bffb44af2d2e7fd3a890678f3e807cfd [1] The proposed release tarball a

Re: [DISCUSS] Binary Values in Key value pairs WAS: Re: [INFO_REQUEST][FLIGHT] - Dynamic schema changes in ArrowFlight streams

Reviving this thread, I don't think anything happened in the meantime on this topic? >From rereading the thread, it seems David mentioned two possible ideas: - A new [byte] binary_value field in the existing KeyValue type, next to the existing string value field. And if you have valid string metad