Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC chair: Kouhei Sutou

2022-01-29 Thread Fan Liya
Congratulations, Kou! Best, Liya Fan Daniël Heres 于2022年1月28日周五 16:04写道: > Congratulations! > > Op vr 28 jan. 2022 om 05:00 schreef Bryan Cutler : > > > Congratulations Kou, thanks for all your work! > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 4:36 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > > Thanks everyone!!! > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.0 - RC10

2022-01-29 Thread Antoine Pitrou
+1 The following checks were succesful on Ubuntu 20.04, x86-64: - source release test with gcc 9.3.0, C++, Python, GLib, Ruby, CUDA - source release test with gcc 8.4.0, C++, Python, GLib, Ruby, CUDA - source release test with clang 10.0.0, C++, Python, GLib, Ruby, CUDA - source release test w

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.0 - RC10

2022-01-29 Thread Yibo Cai
+1. Verified C++ and Python source on Arm64 ubuntu20.04. CC=clang-12 CXX=clang++-12 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1 TEST_PYTHON=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 7.0.0 10 -Original Message- From: Krisztián Szűcs Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2022 7:29 PM To: dev Su

[RUST] [RFC] async parquet reader + Send + Sync

2022-01-29 Thread Andrew Lamb
Hello I am excited to say there is a proposed async parquet reader contribution to arrow-rs ready for review [1]. It adds a requirement for some of the core parquet traits to be `Send` and/or `Sync` -- I don't think this is likely to be a problem for most usecases but I wanted to highlight the is

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.0 - RC10

2022-01-29 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Hi, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC10) of Apache Arrow version 7.0.0. This is a release consisting of 649 resolved JIRA issues[1]. This release candidate is based on commit: e90472e35b40f58b17d408438bb8de1641bfe6ef [2] The source release rc10 is hosted at [3]. The bin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 7.0.0 - RC8

2022-01-29 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 6:19 AM Micah Kornfield wrote: > > If possible getting ARROW-14047 into the release would be good. It is a > parquet correctness issue. But has been around for a while so probably not > a blocker. Already cut the next release candidate just waiting for the binaries. If I