Are you talking about https://github.com/domoritz/arrow-wasm? It definitely
isn’t ready for prime time. The overhead of WASM, some issues with the Rust
implementation (some of which I think will be addressed with the Arrow2
Rust migration), and the much larger bundle size make it not practical
righ
+1 (binding)
Verified on Ubuntu 20.04
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:39 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
> version 6.3.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 686ac184c10f99c89ef555cc97b2231fba4d4cee [1]
>
> The propos
Looking at the CMakeLists:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/abfd2c968b765ffa0607cebd55cb9828e1b61a23/cpp/src/arrow/adapters/orc/CMakeLists.txt#L23
It seems the orc/ subdirectory explicitly lists out the headers, while most
other subdirectories use arrow_install_all_headers and automatically
Hi,
What determines which C++ header files go into the include directory in
Python builds? From CMakeLists.txt all I can find is that if we set
PYARROW_BUILD_ORC to ON then _orc gets built. What really matters is what
goes inside _orc and in particular why doesn’t
arrow/adapters/orc/adapter_option
+1 non-binding
tests pass, steps on Rocky Linux 8
dnf -y update
dnf -y install git tar gcc
git clone https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs
cd arrow-rs/dev/release
./verify-release-candidate.sh 6.3.0 1
On 11/26/21 6:15 PM, Jörn Horstmann wrote:
+1 non-binding
Updated our query engine (which
Rust implementation can be compiled to WebAssembly and is released
biweekly. The Javascript version compiled from Rust may not satisfy all
Javascript users, but maybe there could be some collaboration to reduce
duplicated efforts?
On 11/23/21 9:52 PM, Dominik Moritz wrote:
Ahh, thank you f
