To expedite the donation, perhaps we could move on with the decoupled
version scheme for now to reduce workload and disruption to the
existing users. The julia maintainers can always decide to change the
versioning scheme later after the donation has been completed. This
doesn't seem like a blocker
Hi Rares,
The reason compilation fails when you set ARROW_PARQUET=ON is because this
flag also enables
installing Apache Thrift [1] and support for Thrift in CentOS systems is
fragile (see THRIFT-2559 [2]).
When you disable Parquet, Thrift is not installed as a required dependency.
I recommend yo
Hello,
I'm compiling the C++ library for Arrow 3.0.0 in CentOS 7. It works fine,
but it breaks if I set ARROW_PARQUET=ON. I stops while trying to build
thrift_ep
> scl enable devtoolset-3 "cmake3 ..
\
-DARROW_PARQUET=ON
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for confirming this.
For major release:
As far as I know:
We chose this style because we will develop actively in at
least a few years. Active development will need API breaking
changes. So we release a major version per 3-4 months.
Our release process releases all implementat
The topic of sequencing to achieve things like deterministic output of
head/tail type operations has come up a few times. I went ahead and
drew up a proposal for adding these concepts into the exec plan via a
batch index. It was just going to be an email but it got a bit long
so I put it in a Goo
Okay, that makes sense. Looking forward to making an awesome 6.0 release
then.
On Sep 20, 2021 at 16:38:40, Neal Richardson
wrote:
> Unfortunately, I think we've passed the window for doing a 5.0.1. Since
> it's not trivial to make a release, and we're doing 6.0.0 in a couple of
> weeks (mid-Oc
Unfortunately, I think we've passed the window for doing a 5.0.1. Since
it's not trivial to make a release, and we're doing 6.0.0 in a couple of
weeks (mid-October), in my opinion it makes most sense to focus our efforts
on making the next release excellent.
Neal
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 4:25 PM
Neal, could you make a release?
On Aug 27, 2021 at 14:43:10, Dominik Moritz wrote:
> Are there any other changes for 5.0.1? It would be great to release a
> version with the fixes to the JS bundles since it prevents people from
> upgrading from Arrow 3.
>
> On Jul 30, 2021 at 14:31:59, Neal Ric
+1 on time variation. Please add me to to the invite.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 9:49 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00
> UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in
> joining convenience.
>
> On 9/20/
It looks good to me.
Rok
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> All, can you please take a look at QP's PR at
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11138 ?
>
> I don't believe this requires a vote as this clarification is consistent
> with the already clarified semantics for
All, can you please take a look at QP's PR at
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11138 ?
I don't believe this requires a vote as this clarification is consistent
with the already clarified semantics for Time and Timestamp types. The
current PR contents are ready for a merge, and I think
11 matches
Mail list logo
