Re: Flight SQL

2021-08-24 Thread Micah Kornfield
> > would having the C++ > client be enough here or are we looking for both the client and the server > side? I would think we want a C++ server as well. On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:39 AM Kyle Porter wrote: > We're just going into the C++ implementation now - would having the C++ > client be eno

Re: [NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-08-24-0

2021-08-24 Thread Neal Richardson
Thanks for reviewing, Yibo. The r-sanitizer and autobrew failures are https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13597. IDK about jira for the other issues yet. Neal On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:02 AM Yibo Cai wrote: > Did a quick review. Listed error positions. Removed duplicated failures. > >

RE: [NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-08-24-0

2021-08-24 Thread Yibo Cai
Did a quick review. Listed error positions. Removed duplicated failures. *-osx-* https://dev.azure.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/_build/results?buildId=10372&view=logs&j=cf796865-97b7-5cd1-be8e-6e00ce4fd8cf&t=9f7de14c-8ff0-55c4-a998-d852f888262c&l=15 test-conda-python-3.6-pandas-0.23 (I remember the

Re: [NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-08-24-0

2021-08-24 Thread Neal Richardson
Lots of failed builds here, and many have been failing for quite some time. Has anyone triaged these? Does having a separate builds@ mailing list reduce the visibility too much? Neal On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:03 AM Crossbow wrote: > > Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-08-24-0 > > All tas

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-24 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, The vote carries with 8 +1 votes (of which 4 binding) and no -1 votes. I will submit a PR soon to enhance Schema.fbs. Regards Antoine. Le 19/08/2021 à 18:20, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : Hello, I would like to propose clarifying the allowed value range for the Time types. Specifical