It was the smoothest release so far. No issues.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, 6:15 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:57 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > The Rust crates (arrow, arrow-flight, parquet, parquet_derive,
> datafusion)
> > have now been published to crates.io
> Thanks! Did ev
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:57 AM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> The Rust crates (arrow, arrow-flight, parquet, parquet_derive, datafusion)
> have now been published to crates.io
Thanks! Did everything go fluently? We usually have issues with the
versions defined in the cargo files.
I uploaded the python wh
The Rust crates (arrow, arrow-flight, parquet, parquet_derive, datafusion)
have now been published to crates.io
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:29 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:18 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Krisztián.
> >
> > I can release the Rust crates this evenin
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:18 AM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> Thanks, Krisztián.
>
> I can release the Rust crates this evening (in the next hour or so).
Thank you Andy!
The current status:
1. [done] rebase master
2. [done] upload source
3. [done] upload binaries
4. [done] update website
5. [done] u
Thanks, Krisztián.
I can release the Rust crates this evening (in the next hour or so).
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:17 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> Current status of the post release tasks:
>
> 1. [done] rebase master
> 2. [done] upload source
> 3. [done] upload binaries
> 4. [ ] update websit
Current status of the post release tasks:
1. [done] rebase master
2. [done] upload source
3. [done] upload binaries
4. [ ] update website
5. [done] upload ruby gems
6. [ ] upload js packages
8. [done] upload C# packages
9. [ ] upload rust crates
10. [ ] update conda recipes
11. [kszucs] up
hi Kevin -- I read through the document. It seems plenty reasonable to
me. Look forward to seeing the buildout.
Thanks
Wes
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:10 PM Kevin Gurney wrote:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Thanks very much for taking a first pass over the document! I'll start
> working through the feedbac
Copying the vote result with the usual subject line
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:23 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
>
> The VOTE carries with
> - 4 binding +1
> - 3 non-binding +1
> - 1 non-binding +0
> votes.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> I'm starting the post release tasks and keep you posted about the
> cur
The VOTE carries with
- 4 binding +1
- 3 non-binding +1
- 1 non-binding +0
votes.
Thanks everyone!
I'm starting the post release tasks and keep you posted about the
current status.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:18 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:14 PM Benjamin Kietzman wro
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:14 PM Benjamin Kietzman wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified c++ and python on Windows
Thank you very much for verifying it!
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:47 AM Krisztián Szűcs
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:46 PM Neville Dipale
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
Hi Antoine,
Thanks very much for taking a first pass over the document! I'll start working
through the feedback you've provided soon.
It's useful to have a variety of perspectives here, including from Arrow C++
developers, like yourself. Also, I agree - having more MATLAB users provide
feedbac
+1 (non-binding)
Verified c++ and python on Windows
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:47 AM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:46 PM Neville Dipale
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Krisztian,
> >
> > The full output is at
> > https://gist.github.com/nevi-me/88a6279dd90aea30aa4caaa15fb0cc53
> There
Hi Kevin,
I've added some comments to the document. Bear in mind that I'm not a
MATLAB user, so this is some outside view from a Arrow C++ developer.
It would be nice if MATLAB users could comment on the document,
especially the proposed APIs.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 22/01/2021 à 23:19, Kevin
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:46 PM Neville Dipale wrote:
>
> Hi Krisztian,
>
> The full output is at
> https://gist.github.com/nevi-me/88a6279dd90aea30aa4caaa15fb0cc53
There are failures which seem valid, but didn't occur in the
automatized verification build.
>
> I also ran dev/release/verify-releas
Hi Ying,
This happens sporadically. I've restarted the failed job.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 24/01/2021 à 20:43, Ying Zhou a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> While refactoring my ORC writer so that Antoine and Uwe’s suggestions are
> implemented I found this weird Travis CI error caused by Plasma. Since Plasma
+1 (binding)
Verified source release, binaries and wheels.
The automatized verification scripts have also passed [1].
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9245#issuecomment-762520449
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:53 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified C++, Python and Rust on t
+1 (binding)
Verified C++, Python and Rust on the Apple M1 (natively!) and all works. I had
to do some slight modifications to the verification script but they are
independent of the source tarball: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9315
Cheers
Uwe
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, at 4:59 PM, Neal Ric
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-01-25-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2021-01-25-0
Failed Tasks:
- centos-8-aarch64:
URL:
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2021-01-25-0-travis-centos-8-aarch64
- con
18 matches
Mail list logo
