The intent is that the application can define/use whatever keys it
wants - though C++/Python don't expose that fully, which is another
shortcoming that should be addressed. We should also perhaps consider
standardizing/exposing a way to set that extra_info header in
Python/C++ from Java and vice ve
I think B) is closer to what I was thinking.
We may be using the term statically and dynamically typed a little
differently -- I am sorry for the confusion. I have somewhat lost track of
exactly what we are proposing and for that I apologize.
I propose a next step of sketching out a proposed API
To use S3 it appears I can either use `pyarrow.fs.S3FileSystem` or I
can use s3fs and it gets wrapped (I think) with
`pyarrow.fs.DaskFileSystem`. However, I don't see any documentation
for `pyarrow.fs.DaskFileSystem`. Is this option supported going
forwards? I'm currently configuring an s3fs ins
Cool yeah, I had noticed that and it is definitely something that should be
fixed.
I think that is only one part of it though, right? We'd still need to toss
the keys in the metadata for it to be picked up on the C++ side. I'm not
sure if that set of keys is documented or even appropriate to rely
Hi Arrow-Dev,
I've written up a proposal to make some enhancements to the authentication
process. I've captured the overall goals on JIRA here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9804
The proposal itself is in this Google Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TutHf9ttw3rLzBvYxJXP2q6fZ
Hi,
Thank you for this enlightening discussion, Andrew!
So, just to make sure I understood, are you proposing A), B) or something
else?
A) we should not accept / declare polymorphic operations: all types should
be known based on the operation name (e.g. sum_f32, plus_f32, etc.)
B) we should cont
Ah - I see. I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9802.
At a quick glance, I think what's wrong is StatusUtils.toGrpcStatus
doesn't copy the metadata from the CallStatus into the gRPC status it
constructs. This should be an easy enough fix if you'd like to look at
it. (Adding an inte
+1 (binding)
In addition to the verifications on
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7985, I built and checked the R
package locally.
Neal
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:55 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I ran the followings on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
>
> * INSTALL_NODE=0 \
> CUDA
Hey David,
Appreciate the quick response!
I had been doing it that way, but I found that If I was sending something
along the lines of:
ErrorFlightMetadata errorFlightMetadata = new ErrorFlightMetadata();
errorFlightMetadata.insert("my_custom_key", "hello");
listener.error(CallStatus.INTERNAL
Hey Patrick,
How are you sending the error to the client from the server side? You
should be calling `listener.error` or `listener.onError` with a
`FlightRuntimeException` (which you can get via
CallStatus..withDescription(...).toRuntimeException);
this will get the status code and message to the
Attendees:
Projjal Chanda
Micah Kornfield
Neal Richardson
Andrew Wieteska
Discussion:
* 1.0.1 patch release is open for vote now, please test it out
* ARROW-1644 nested parquet reading in C++: discussed division of subtasks,
progress
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:05 PM Neal Richardson
wrote:
> Hi a
Hey Radu,
A. I don't think there's a standard way. You can also think about the
DoAction endpoint (which is a server-side stream) if you don't want to
abuse DoGet/if you want push notifications to be non-Arrow data.
B. This sounds fine. Reading from a stream is blocking, and it's
guaranteed to un
Hey all,
I'm working on a project that has a Java arrow flight server and has a
pyarrow client, both version 1.0.0. I've been trying to get richer errors
back to the python client instead of the generic "grpc error ...".
I see that the spec explicitly doesn't try to define metadata:
https://arrow
Hi,
I am looking at the best way to push notifications from a server to clients
over flight and I have a few questions on the approach:
A. Is there a standard way of doing it and/or does this fundamentally go
against flight philosophy?
B. One approach is to run a doGet and then have the server
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-08-19-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-08-19-0
Failed Tasks:
- conda-osx-clang-py38:
URL:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-08-19-0-azure-conda-osx-clang-py38
- cond
15 matches
Mail list logo