hi Mitar,
Let's discuss further on JIRA? It's best to keep all the information
about the issue in one place.
Thanks
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 7:42 PM Mitar wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I added:
>
> serialization_context.register_type(
> np.matrix, 'np.matrix',
> custom_serializer=_serialize_numpy_a
Hi!
I added:
serialization_context.register_type(
np.matrix, 'np.matrix',
custom_serializer=_serialize_numpy_array_list,
custom_deserializer=_deserialize_numpy_array_list)
But it did not help. Probably also because np.matrix is a subclas of
np.ndarray anyway. So no change here.
An i
Hey Mitar,
It might be as simple as adding a handler here:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/python/pyarrow/serialization.py#L300
Do you want to try that?
-- Philipp.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 3:22 PM Mitar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I do not know where to start looking into this? Not sure if I
Let's discuss on the JIRA issue. AFAIK we have no unit tests relating
to numpy.matrix so most likely this was an accidental "feature". If
there is no other volunteer to help on the issue it's hard to predict
when it will get done. numpy.matrix isn't used by very many people
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at
Hi!
I do not know where to start looking into this? Not sure if I have
enough knowledge about arrow to be able to make a PR.
Miar
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 3:17 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> hi Mitar,
>
> I see you reported the issue on October 2 and no one has volunteered
> to fix it yet. Are you
hi Mitar,
I see you reported the issue on October 2 and no one has volunteered
to fix it yet. Are you up to submit a PR?
Thanks
Wes
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:14 PM Mitar wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> It seems numpy's matrix is not supported in recent versions of pyarrow:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira
Hi!
It seems numpy's matrix is not supported in recent versions of pyarrow:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3399
Any ideas why this would be happening?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
I just reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4301
There is a problem with updating the Gandiva Java POM file that also
affected 0.12.0. I do not think it is a release blocker
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:42 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> There need to be a net of 3 binding +1 votes. Rel
Thank you, this is helpful.
On the page alignment issue, is it enough to ensure that each buffer
(according to the IPC protocol) has a size with a certain multiple?
This might be something we can make configurable on the IPC write path
on the C++ side. There is nothing fundamentally illegal in the
Hi,
Basically, fletcher has emphasized on reading an Arrow schema and
generating a
hardware interface along with a template for the functional part of the
accelerator.
That way the FPGAs are aware for arrow-backed data.
On the other hand, we do not work on enabling FPGAs to interpret arrow
format
Le 29/03/2019 à 16:06, Wes McKinney a écrit :
>
>> * How to make it available to all developers? Do we want to integrate into
>> CI or not?
>
> I'd like to eventually have a bot that we can ask to run a benchmark
> comparison versus master. Reporting on all PRs automatically might be
> quite a
11 matches
Mail list logo
